Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт физиологии, биохимии и питания животных – филиал Федерального государственного бюджетного научного учреждения «Федеральный научный центр животноводства – ВИЖ имени академика Л.К. Эрнста»
ABSTRACT. The central tenets of the author’s conception are as follows. 1) Сonstitutive resistance (CR) is a high integrated physiological index reflecting ability of the organism to maintain the key functional parameters within the ranges that are compatible with life, or with functions intensity of subsystems (par example, with level of milk productivity). The manifestations of CR may be different depending upon time scale. In fast time, CR characterizes the rate of ageing, in slow time СК does indicate the level of critic limit of adaptive reactions under action of stress-factors. The primery quantitative estimates of CR have been made on cows by the analyzing data of 305-d milk yields trough all succsessive lactations. 2) The productive herdlife is, to some extent, determined by the CR level at first lactation: as larger is this “initial” level of CR, the higher is a probability that the cow will have a long productive life. 3) There is a definite relationship between values of CR determined by the age dynamics of 305-d milk yields and parameters estimated by dynamics of cow’s culling (by hazard function). These data suggest the existence of a definite similarity in mechanisms of resistance, realizing on the level of organism and functional subsystems (morphological structures and control mechanisms of lactation function). 4) With the aim to prolong the length of productive life and elevate reproductive efficiency, it is recommended to search the methods to increase initial level of CR which is formed during pre- and postnatal periods of life.
REFERENCES
1. Anisimov V.N. Molekulyarnye i fiziologicheskie mekhanizmy stareniya (Molecular and physiological bases of ageing). St.Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2003.
2. Basovskii N.Z., Kuznetsov V.M. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po genetiko-ekonomicheskoi optimizatsii programm krupnomasshtabnoi selektsii v molochnom skotovodstve (Recommndations on genetic-economical optimization of large-scale breeding processes in dairy cattle). Moscow: VASKhNIL, 1982, 32 p.
3. Bielakovic G., Nicolova D., Gluud L.L. et al. Mortality in randomized trials of antioxidant supplements for primary and secondary prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis. J.A.M.A. 2007, 297: 842-857.
4. Boettcher P.J., Jairath L.K., Dekkers J.C.M. Comparison of methods for genetic evaluation of sires for survival of their daughters in the first three lactations. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 82: 1034-1044.
5. Bozhkov A.I., Kolotova T.Yu., Volyanskii Yu.L. et al. In: Nestabil’nost’ genoma i epigeneticheskoe nasledovanie eukariot (Non-stability of genome and epigenetic heredity in eukaryotes). Khar’kov: Oko Publ.,2007.
6. Bozhkov A.I., Dubovskaya V.L., Dmitriev Yu.V., Meshaikina N.I., Maleev V.F., Klimov E.M. Uspekhi gerontologii – Advances in Gerontology. 2009, 22(2): 259-268.
7. Cherepanov G.G., Reshetov V.B. Problemy biologii productivnykh zhivotnykh - Problems of Productive Animal Biology. 2010, 1: 5-17.
8. Cherepanov G.G., Reshetov V.B. Problemy biologii productivnykh zhivotnykh - Problems of Productive Animal Biology. 2011, 3: 26-37.
9. Cherepanov G.G., Bogdanova N.A. Problemy biologii productivnykh zhivotnykh - Problems of Productive Animal Biology. 2012, 1: 110-119.
10. Cherepanov G.G., Bogdanova N.A., Makar Z.N. Problemy biologii productivnykh zhivotnykh - Problems of Productive Animal Biology. 2013, 1: 100-113.
11. Dontsov V.I. Immunobiologiya postnatal’nogo razvitiya (Immunobiology of postnatal development). Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1990, 152 p.
12. Dontsov V.I., Krut’ko V.N., Podkolzin A.A. Fundamental’nye mekhanizmy geroprofilaktiki (Basic mechanisms of geroprophylaxis). Moscow: Bioinformservis Publ., 2002, 464 p.
13. Dontsov V.I., Krut’ko V.N. Uspekhi sovremennoi biologii - Advances in Contemporary Biology. 2010, 1: 3-19.
14. Ducrocq V., Casella G.A. Bayesian analysis of mixed survival models. Genet. Sel. Evol. 1996, 28: 505-529.
15. Eigen M., Schuster P. The hypercycle: a principle of natural self-organization. Springer, 1979.
16. Galochkin V.A., Cherepanov G.G. Problemy biologii productivnykh zhivotnykh - Problems of Productive Animal Biology. 2013, 1: 5-29.
17. Galochkin V.A., Agafonova A.V., Galochkina V.P., Cherepanov G.G. Problemy biologii productivnykh zhivotnykh - Problems of Productive Animal Biology. 2014, 3: 5-36.
18. Gavrilova N.S., Semenova V.G., Gavrilov L.A. In: Voprosy vosproizvodstva naseleniya i demograficheskoi politiki (Problems of reproduction and demography politics). Moscow: Institute of Social Research Publ., 1982, P. 108-123.
19. Gavrilov L.A., Gavrilova N.S. Biologiya prodolzhitel’nosti zhizni (Biology of life span). Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1991, 280 p.
20. Gerasimchuk A.V. In: Povyshenie geneticheskogo potentsiala molochnogo skota (Increasing of cattle’s genetic potential). Moscow: Agropromizdat Publ., 1986, P. 179-183.
21. Gill G.S., Allaire F.R. Relationship of age at first calving, days open, days dry, and herdlife to aprofit function for dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1976, 59(6): 1131-1139.
22. Golubev A.G. Uspekhi gerontologii –Advances in Gerontology . 2009, 22(3): 387-400.
23. Golubev A.G. Uspekhi gerontologii –Advances in Gerontology . 2009, 22(2): 205-222.
24. Grodzinskii D.M., Voitenko V.P., Kutlyakhmedov Yu.A., Kol’tover V.K. Nadezhnost’ i starenie biologicheskikh sistem (Reliability an`d ageing of biological systems). Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1987, 176 p.
25. Hare E., Norman H.D., Wright J.R. Survival rates and productive herd life of dairy cattle in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89: 3713-3720.
26. Holloszy J.O. Longevity of exercising male rats: effect of an antioxidant supplemented diet. Mech. Ageing Dev. 1998, 100: 211-219.
27. Kharitonov S.N., Speranskii A.T., Kondrashev A.A., Grigor’ev Yu.N. Printsipy postroeniya li-neinykh modelei v zhivotnovodstve (metodicheskie rekomendatsii) (Principles of elaborating linear models in animal husbandry: Methodical recommendations). Moscow: Institute of Breeding Affair Publ., 1994, 103 p.
28. Kol’tover V.K. Uspekhi sovremennoi biologii - Advances in Contemporary Biology. 1983, 96(4): 85-100.
29. Kudrin A.G., Zagorordnev Yu.P. Zootekhnicheskie osnovy povysheniya pozhiznennoi produktivnosti korov (Zootechnical bases of increasing length of productive life in cows). Moscow: Kolos Publ., 2007, 95 p.
30. Kuznetsov V.M. Sovremennye metody analiza i planirovaniya selektsii v molochnom stade (Contemporary methods of analysis and planning selection in dairy herds). Kirov: Zonal North-East Agricultural Research Institute Publ., 2001, 116 p.
31. Kuznetsov V.M. Metody plemennoi otsenki zhivotnykh s vvedeniem v teoriyu BLUP (Methods of breed assessment of animals with introduction to the theory of BLUP). Kirov: Zonal North-East Agricultural Research Institute Publ., 2003, 358 p.
32. Kuznetsov V.M. [Breed evaluation of animals: the past, present, and future: a review]. Problemy biologii productivnykh zhivotnykh - Problems of Productive Animal Biology. 2012, 4: 18-57.
33. Kuznetsov V.M. [Breeding lines and holsteinization: analytical methods, state of the art and prospects]. Problemy biologii productivnykh zhivotnykh - Problems of Productive Animal Biology. 2013, 3: 25-79.
34. Levina G.N., Artyukh V.M., Zelepukina M.V. Produktivnoe dolgoletie krupnogo rogatogo skota molochnykh porod (Productive herdlife of milk cattle). Dubrovitsy: Institute of Animal Husbandry Publ., 2012: 51-71.
35. Mikhal’skii A.I., Petrovskii A.I., Yashin A.I. Teoriya otsenivaniya neodnorodnykh populyatsii (Theory of estimating non-homogeneous populations). Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1989, 128 p.
36. Mikhal’skii A.I. Metody analiza geterogennykh struktur v populyatsii (Methods of analyzing heterogeneous structures in populations). Moscow: Institute of Control Problems Publ., 2002, 62 p.
37. Nikol’skii V.V. Infektsiya i immunitet u sel’skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh (Infection deseases in farm animals). Kiev: Urozhai Publ., 1974.
38. Novosel’tsev V.N., Yashin A.I. Informatsionnye modeli zdravookhranenii - Information Models in Care of Public Health. 2002, 5-7: 2-11.
39. Novosel’tsev V.N. Nauka v Rossii – Science in Russia. 2003, 1: 52-58.
40. Novosel’tsev V.N., Arking R., Novosel’tseva Zh.A., Yashin A.I. Problemy upravleniya – Problems in Control. 2004, 4: 27-40.
41. Novoseltsev V.N., Carey J.R., Novoseltseva J.A. et al. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 2004, 125(1): 77-87.
42. Odent M. Primal Health. London: Century Hutchinson, 1986.
43. Orr W.C., Mockett R.J., Benes J.J., Sohal R.S. Effects of overexpression of copper-zinc and manganese superpxide dismutase, catalase, and thioredoxin reductase genes on longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 8: 26418-26422.
44. Ozernyuk N.D., Zotin A.I., Yurovitskii Yu.G. Ontogenez - Developmental Biology. 1971, 2(6): 565-571.
45. Proshina O., Loskutov N. Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii - Animal Husbandry in Russia. 2011, 9: 40-41.
46. Raguz N., Jovanovac S., Gantner V., Meszaros G., Solkner J. Analysis of factors affecting the length of productive life in Croatian dairy cows. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 17(2): 232-240.
47. Roxström A., Ducrocq V., Strandberg E. Survival analysis of longevity in dairy cattle on a lactation basis. Genet. Sel. Evol., 2003, 35: 305-318.
48. Sel’tsov V.I., Molchanova N.V., Kalievskaya G.F., Tokhov M.Kh. Produktivnoe dolgoletie krupnogo rogatogo skota molochnykh porod (Productive herdlife of milk cattle). Dubrovitsy: Institute of Animal Husbandry Publ., 2012: 9-27.
49. Skulachev V.P. Biokhimiya -Biochemistry, 2007, 42(12): 1700-1714.
50. Sokal R.S. The free-radical theory of aging. Free Radical Biol. & Med. 2002. 33: 573-574.
51. Tokarev Yu.T., Novikova N.N. Materialy Vserossiiskoi konferentsii: Selektsionno-geneticheskie i ekologo-tekhnologicheskie problemy povysheniya dolgoletnego produktivnogo ispol’zovaniya molochnykh korov (Proc. Conf.: Breeding and ecology-technological problems of increasing productive longevity in milk cows). Penza, 2008: 53-60.
52. Uoddington K.Kh. In: Na puti k teoreticheskoi biologii. I. Prolegomeny (Towards a theoretical biology. I. Prolegomena. Translated from: IUBS Symposium (Ed. C.H. Waddington), Birmingham: Aldine Publ., 1968). Moscow: Mir Publ., 1970, 181 p.
53. Vanraden P.M., Wiggans G.R. Productive life evaluation: calculation, accuracy, and economic value. J. Dairy Sci. 1995, 78: 631-638.
54. Vaupel J.W., Manton K.G., Stallard E. The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography. 1979, 16: 439-454.
55. Yashin A.I., Ukraintseva S.V. Problemy upravleniya – Problems of Control. 2004, 4: 18-26.
56. Yashin A.I., Iachine I.A. How frailty models can be used for evaluating of mortality and longevity limits: taking advantage of an interdisciplinary approach. Demography. 1997, 34: 1-18.
57. Yashin A.I., Ukraintseva S.V., Boiko S.I., Arbeev K.G. Individual ageing and cancer risk: How are they related? Demographic Research. 2003, 98: 163-196.
58. Zotin A.I. Termodinamicheskii podkhod k problemam razvitiya, rosta i stareniya (Thermodynamic approach to problems of development, growth and ageing). Moscow: Mir Publ., 1974, 184 p.
59. Zotin A.I., Zotina R.S. Fenomenologicheskaya teoriya razvitiya, rosta i stareniya organizma (Phenomenologic theory of development, growth and ageing). Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1993, 364 p.